The Jackuul Blog

It seems that in a recent news post someone said only the ‘tech savvy’ were into Ron Paul, while the average American was not or did not even know accurately his stand on positions. What does this mean? I take it as meaning “Smart people go for Paul”. Seeing how most tech savvy are in college, under the age of 30, and have donated well over 21 million to Paul, set up blimps for Paul, and basically lead the crusade for Paul… it is odd to think that the blackout could have such an effect or affect (or defect) upon Main Stream America… We raised millions. We broke records. We have tried to get the message out. We have explained and explained and explained. I even did a total calculation of the 2008 Budget in a way that states would be responsible for their own business, 1.7 trillion could be cut, the Personal Income Tax eliminated, while at the same time Social Security would remain secure, and there would be a 300-400 Billion dollar surplus. And that’s without figuring in how much extra spending by citizens of this wonderful land would boost taxes from other sources.

Yet… they just… don’t listen. It’s like Bush/Clinton/Obama Mind Control. Except without the smell of burning oil, cigars, or marshmallows. So, what’s to blame for this entirely lackluster response from average citizens who ignore the CIA reports about what causes terror? What’s to blame for the mass herd mentality of the public? Could it really be the Main Stream Media? Considering after I stopped watching them I began to think less and less of every politician… I think there could be a connection. Like an abused puppy, they keep coming back for more, more spoon-fed bullshit from the loving eye of education.

Anyone ever think of… turning that glowing tube of misinformation off and… thinking? Like, read the Internet, read the reports, and stop believing everything “pundits” say. I am sick of this “pundit” driven news era where they give giant wind-bags a whole hour to bullshit and indoctrinate the public with their ideas on what should be right or wrong. Boycott France? Boycott your goddamn mouth. Universally they all suck, and they all cut off answers claiming “Its spin” or something, and then want “yes or no” to things like “Is the war on drugs effective? Then when the guest says “No” they’re labeled a nut and called a kook. The real kook is the one spreading the lies as truth, and making the truth seem improbable.

I’m no religious nutter, and I have no personal god, but isn’t this the kind of shit warned about somewhere? Something like “The biggest victory for the devil was convincing everyone he didn’t exist”? Who’s to say why the truth no longer exists as believable. If we pulled out of Iraq, and the world, all our men, bases, ships, planes, and what have you - where would the reason for attacking us come from? There’d be no incentive to attack us. There’d be no propaganda about us in a few years. Anyone trying to lead a cause against us would find little support. They don’t hate our freedoms - they hate our bases in Saudi Arabia. If Congress wants to declare war, then fine - declare it and let us wipe them out like Mr. Clean wipes out dirt. Otherwise, let’s get the f**k out, consolidate our forces, fix our own god damn country, and give everyone else total unrestricted access to our markets.

By removing all market restrictions, we remove further incentives for “Hate America!”. If we fix our country and it becomes prosperous like it should be, where our people are competitive, and our power economically is secure it will give others a reason to go “Hey, why can’t we do that here?” If we allow for the constitution to be our guiding document again, and get rid of all these bullcrap laws for and against religion, people will see us as a place where anyone can be anything, without some bible humper trying to force them one way, and some bible burner trying to force another.

It’s a tragedy that the people of this country are divided and divided and divided some more. You see, that is how people are conquered. You divide them, and you conquer them. You keep the division strong, and like a magician, you keep them redirected so they don’t pay attention to the other issues around them. You fool them into thinking things that are bad are good, and things that are good are really bad. You make them accept the lie, and reject the truth.

Ron Paul represents not just the core conservative values, no, it’s not like that. If you remember anything from history, Republicans used to be considered the progressive party, the can-do party, the one willing to take a risk and willing to forge ahead and be something different than a socialist liberal party or a staunch religious conservative fascist party. Under Teddy Roosevelt Republicans established the first National Parks, enacted child labor laws, and went trust-busting so that the economy was fair and free trade remained that.

Today we have seriously strayed the path of the Party’s great leaders. Two of the heads on our Mount Rushmore monument are Republicans. They did what they could to unite the country, to compromise, and to better it. I highly doubt if Lincoln or Theodore Roosevelt were alive today that they would go near the Republican Party, or the Democratic Party. They’d be shocked by what politics has become in a way. I know it never changes, but I believe people stood for more back then than they do now. Today its a parade of sock puppets.

What’s so wrong with the idea of dropping the personal Income Tax? Some say it is needed, yet I have prooven that states can do the job of the federal government. Local people running Local Governments know more about Local Problems than Federal government. They’re also under more public and local scrutiny. If we were to give the states back the programs for each one to run in their own way we could eliminate more than a trillion and a half dollars of federal government spending - the states could do their own thing, and that is fine. The less massive overhead, the more money the economy will have in play, and the better off we will be.

If California wants to allow gay marriage, and Utah doesn’t, then so be it. It should be states above nation when it comes to social issues. If a state doesn’t want to have any income tax in it, great, it can run off of sales tax and the people in it will pay no income taxes of any kind. I don’t see why people would not unite under this, since all services will still be there depending on the states, and no ones benifits for Social Security are at risk. Medicare, and Medicaid could easily be run via the states own organizations.

In the end, it boils down to that regardless of what the Main Stream Media says, Main Stream America needs to figure it out. Something needs to be done to present to them all the information, all the facts, all the relevant issues presented. Not sound bites and simplistic answers. If America cannot handle the truth, and the truth in detail - can America really even attempt to survive? The first step of taking this country back from the corporate masters is information, education, and de-indoctrination.

I guess, since the MSM doesn’t want that - since they’d get low ratings - it’ll be like a door to door thing. Perhaps going door to door in suits, and then saying “I’m not from a church, I’m here on behalf of the Country” and then educating, informing, and discussing would be the only way.

Maybe that should be the next step in the Ron Paul Revolution. Door to door. Educate, inform, and explain. Show them, give examples, show the figures, explain how states could handle things better. Local to Local always beats National to Local. Because Local People know Local Problem and will have Local Solutions.