With this unfair and unconstitutional federal income tax we are being bled dry. We cannot save, we cannot afford, and we cannot make it when we owe the tax system money that we cannot make to pay off. We end up in a catch 22 situation in which there is no possibility of escape. Stuck in the middle, one end is obliteration and homelessness, the other is enslavement to the federal tax system.

It is under these conditions that people become complacent too. They start to incur debt spending, just like our government does – it leads by example after all. Soon, people spend so much in debt just to make ends meet and to be able to eat, that they become insolvent. Just as our federal government will be too. So how can we stop this never ending cycle? We must break it! We must dethrone the taxman as our masters and abolish the personal income tax.

In fact, if done right, the personal income tax abolishment could end up giving us a 200-400 billion dollar surplus federally per year… and that is without ending social security (if phased out it would leave us with nearly a trillion in surplus a year). So how is this possible? You need to look at the systems in place. Many states have their own versions of these already – so transfer responsibility BACK to the states, transfer it all back to where it should be. In the end, you can end the dependency on a tax upon our income, and states will determine the best ways of fund collecting.

However, this also requires the use of Ron Paul’s foreign policies. Free trade, and non-intervention. Not isolationist, but rather anti-interventionist. We pull our troops back in this endless war that is bankrupting our government and our morals, we pull our bases out of all overseas operations. This will cut billions upon billions. That is not to say we let anyone go though – rather they are stationed here at home, upon our borders and our naval installations on our land. Our policy should be defensive, not aggressive. It is absolutely asinine that we should be the ones to start a war – we are the ones that FINISH wars. That is where our morality as a nation lies. Will we be the ones to attack for resources, or will we be the ones to defend our allies and ourselves when we are attacked? The moral high ground rests with the latter, and ‘safety’ be damned. We are more secure, and we are safer if we play defense… because that gives no one a really good reason to touch us.

I personally would rather die a free man, than live in a country that is self obsessed with the bullshit reason that is safety. I want my freedom to be just that – free. Sacrifice freedom for safety? Bugger off.

Ever wonder why Americans are getting stupid? Ever think to yourself exactly why the masses seem to be getting dumbed down? Dumber people buy more useless things! Dumber people watch more ad-ridden shows. Dumber people… have lower standards. Why is this?

It has become economically viable to sell to dumber people. Americans, and all humans, start with the capacity for greatness, but our corporate masters who use the illegal and wrong methods of creating their businesses that hurt Free Trade and the entire capitalist system are pulling us down.

I support free market, and I support survival of the fittest, however one must notice when a business uses unfair tactics to create a megalithic corporation that has no competition. When this happens, it becomes a battle for the most people, and to do that they must dumb people down. If you eliminate the refined tastes of the consumer, they will be satisfied with the mediocre. Half of this is actually to blame on all of us who consume the products that support these corporations.

However, the other half is the corporation that hides the truths behind their products. Many use cheap overseas labor and try to say it is too expensive here. They will say that even if we have the laws in place that make it easier here than there. Once the Revolution has come to fruition and we have a limited federal government, and hopefully our president is Ron Paul in 2008, we can start combating these corporate snake oil salesmen.

They should be forced to honestly label products, citizens should be able to sue any corporation that uses dishonest tactics, there should be no limits on damages, and finally every individual should have the right to exact any kind of civil suit or criminal suit upon any corporation that pollutes. Who needs the EPA when the companies that are pumping out acids into rivers get a lawsuit from every person in town? Think of the repercussions that will happen when every individual gets the right to sue any company that ruins land, ruins business, and ruins the entire free market ideals through savage tactics to eliminate competition via sabotage and fraud?

Through this, the system will be a self correcting and self cleansing one. Through this, we shall never need to worry again about not being able to do something. We will all be able to take action, we will all be able to file suit, and in the end they will be forced to reckon with the 300 million citizens who are fed up with it. Then, maybe the dumbing down will discontinue, and the education and the actual intellectual vibrancy hidden under the surface in ever man and woman in this country can be brought back again.

Yet no one does anything about it. Nothing significant. Unless we march to Washington.

How is it that Ron Paul gets 70,000 votes in his Congressional Primary in his district, polls highly for the presidential race in his district, and yet only gets 6,000 votes in his district in the Presidential Primary. Why is it that the media says “Paul is threatened in his own district” when he clearly is not? It’s an easy thing to come to many conclusions on. Here are mine: The media motive is to discredit Dr. Paul through misinformation, much like they did to Dennis up in UFO land. In reality there was no threat. Secondly, I believe that not all the votes are counted, as many of the voting systems and protocols are just plain nuts. You want a better protocol?

It’s easy. Pen. Paper. Circle the Name. Then count them in front of cameras under surveillance on public broadcast, and submit the total numbers at the end. Then do it again, and compare the numbers. If they differ, congratulations, you f**ked up. If they’re the same – you cheated. Do it again with different people. It might take a week. Who cares. Accuracy is the standard that we should live by – not inefficiency. Eliminate electronic voting machines unless they’re punch card machines that give you the card back for your own inspection. Then those ballots shall be counted by machine, and by hand. If the numbers are the same, you cheated, and have to do it once more by hand. If they differ, you cheated, and have to do it again until the numbers match.

So why the number inefficiency? 70k versus 6k. Hmmm. Something smells like rotting fish. And it’s not one of the candidates. Some will say “Ha! It looks like his own district doesn’t want him for president” – Then why did he poll for that question so highly? Obviously more than 6,000 did. Hmm. Maybe… the voting was *gasp* rigged? Maybe Paul knows the real answer about how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll tootsie pop. Perhaps the world will never know.

Cheaters.

Also, if it is true that things are rigged – I’m expecting to see a Clinton win at the convention for the Demicans. The Republocrates already decided on McCain for some stupid reason. Where’s Barry Goldwater’s ghost when you need him?